SCROLL DOWN TO EXPLORE THE TRIAL
SCROLL DOWN TO EXPLORE THE TRIAL
The mock trial provided a way to discuss the threat of human-induced climate change without first having to “prove” it is happening. The latest IPCC report provided the scientific heft and sense of urgency. I didn’t know what to expect of the audience’s final decision but was gratified with the result, of course. I hope we can conclude that the audience navigated through the arguments and claims to conclude that these were valid concerns and solutions.
I have to repeat a bit of what I said last night. In 1988, an international meeting of climatologists was held in Toronto where the scientists were so concerned with the threat of global warming that they issued a call for a 20% reduction in greenhouse gases in 15 years. Had we heeded that call which at that time was very achievable, we would have been well on our way to a path of sustainable energy. But in order to get US President George HW Bush to attend the Earth Summit in Rio in 1992, a much watered down target of stabilization of 1990 levels of emission by 2000 was signed, but then ignored. In 1997, in Kyoto, delegates proposed a target of 5 – 6% reduction below 1990 levels by 2010. Canada ratified the Kyoto treaty in 2001 but did little to achieve the reduction and the current government withdrew from the treaty altogether as our emissions continued to rise. Unlike the prosecutor’s claims last night, there are countries that are taking strong steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The carbon manifesto was based on the need to move to non-carbon energy much faster.
That’s why the mock trial was so timely. The warming is already upon us yet we still have time to hold off chaos and any further delay simply leaves an unprecedented future for our children and grandchildren. Thanks everyone who participated in what I hope will be a continuing call for action. Please click below to take my Manifesto Pledge and then share it widely with your family and friends.
For over 30 years, David Suzuki has been Canada’s most beloved scientist. But on October 9, he publicly accused the Canadian government, Canadian corporations, and even Canadian citizens of serious crimes against our country, environment and planet. Now, he will stand trial for those claims and defend his beliefs in front of the largest jury in history: Canada.
The Trial of David Suzuki, created and produced by Laurie Brown in partnership with Donnelly Law, is presented by Cape Farewell and ROM Contemporary Culture, as part of Carbon 14: Climate is Culture and is supported by: Caroline Birks of Panicaro Foundation and John St. Special thanks to the David Suzuki Foundation.
I’m David Suzuki. I stand here today as an elder, beyond the temptations of money, fame or power. I have no hidden agenda but to speak the truth.
Human beings and the natural world are often too beautiful for words. I’ve spent much of my career filming the wonders of nature and our place in it – many times words would fail me. As I near the end of my life, I am amazed at how much power, technology, wealth and consumption humanity has acquired, and that has transformed our lives while at the same time undermining the very life support systems on which our existence and well-being depend – air, water, soil and food, photosynthetic activity and biodiversity.
Now, my grandchildren are the joy of my life, but I know how uncertain their future is and all the baubles of our consumer society cannot compensate for the rich wonders and generosity of nature. But you don’t have to be moved by the beauty of the world to understand that we depend on it utterly for our very existence. My postwar generation and the boomers who followed lived like kings and queens as we partied as if there was no tomorrow, never worrying about the kind of world we were leaving for our children. Well, the party’s over.
“Human beings and the natural world are on a collision course… If not checked, many of our current practices put at serious risk the future we wish for human society…No more than one or a few decades remain before the chance to avert the threats we now confront will be lost and the prospects for humanity immeasurably diminished… A great change in our stewardship of the earth and the life on it is required if vast human misery is to be avoided and our global home on this planet is not to be irretrievably mutilated.”
Those words are taken from the World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity, from November 1992, over two decades ago. It was signed by over 1,700 senior scientists from 71 countries and included more than half of all Nobel prizewinners.
Since the World Scientists’ Warning, scientific study after scientific study has documented the perilous state of the atmosphere, oceans, forests, vanishing species, toxic pollution and the unanticipated consequences of powerful new technologies.
Now we stand on the edge of a precipice that is of our own making. In less than 100 years, we have managed to lose sight of our absolute dependence on nature, and our responsibility not to foul our own home. We congratulate ourselves for growth, expansion, technological advances, and profits, and we live with the illusion that our inventiveness enables us to keep the economy growing without limit.
Canada has been near the head of the line when it comes to growth and profits in the world. And the tyranny of the belief that the economy is what matters most to the country has transformed us to a point where we can hardly recognize ourselves. George Monbiot writes “Canada: a “liberal, cultured, decent country” has been “transformed into a thuggish petro-state.” I believe this is who we are. A country that in spite of everything science tells us, what the changing weather tells us, is determined to squeeze every bit of oil out of the ground to grab the last of the profits to feed an addiction that we know is destroying a future from coming generations.
Governments and corporations are not just failing us, they are the driving forces that are taking us to the brink, wilfully ignoring the consequences and thereby committing what can only be called an intergenerational crime. The consequences of their actions — and inaction — will reverberate for generations. Wilful blindness is an indictable offence as is criminal negligence, but intergenerational crime is so recent a concept that we have yet to develop the legal mechanisms to act. Our so-called leaders must be held accountable.
This accountability must extend to every citizen of Canada. We have failed our children and our planet because of our fear of change and our fear of the future.
I accuse corporations, including the automobile, energy, pharmaceutical, chemicals, and agricultural sectors; of putting profit and growth before all else including the survival and health of society. That their corporate lobbying is setting our country’s agenda is shameful.
I accuse Canadian politicians of intergenerational crimes. Their actions will affect our grandchildren, and their grandchildren.
I accuse Canadian corporations and government of immoral activity with devastating consequences for the poorest, most vulnerable nations on the globe.
I accuse Canada’s politicians and its citizens of wilful blindness, of failing to be informed about critical issues that they have the power to influence and of failing to take action when they are aware of avoidable ecological crises.
If my country refuses to exonerate me, then it stands guilty of failing to defend its vaunted claim of freedom of speech. If my words are judged treasonous, then so be it.
With my carbon manifesto, I aim to stop these crimes:
I hereby offer a manifesto pledge:
Human beings have become so powerful that we are altering the biological, chemical and physical properties of the planet on a geological scale. We must look to the future, and science rather than politics or economics must be our guide.
I know our dependence on fossil fuels must end.
I know it will take massive change for us as a species to survive let alone thrive in the converging global crisis around climate, food, water, fuel and the economy.
I pledge to stop the epidemic of blame around the climate crisis and recognize my own responsibility.
The way I live my life is part of the problem.
I believe we need a new vision for our future as Canadians and as humans.
I pledge that I am ready to implement change. I want to be part of the solution not part of the problem.
I stand with the Carbon Manifesto. This is our way forward.
HAVE GUILTY EVIDENCE TO SHARE?
Submit your testimony, link, image or video below, and select the appropriate tags to help other jury members find it.
Let the people of the future worry about it, why should we, too many bills, got a rough job haven’t got time to worry about stuff like this, after all that’s why we pay our government – ask the Mayans they lived for the now.
Suzuki “Full of False Arguments” that promote social and environmental harm.
We will see no widespread acceptance of renewable energy until the Wind Turbine Industry fully recognizes, and develops mitigation for, the adverse health impacts that large, industrial wind turbines have on nearby residents.
Since David Suzuki’s manifesto decrees willful blindness — “failing to be informed about critical issues” — an indictable offense, it seems only fitting that his own claims be put under closer scrutiny.
Pipe or Perish: Saving an Oil Industry at Risk
Mythbusting: Don’t the Oilsands Only Benefit Alberta?
Economic Contribution of the Oil Sands.
“What are Oil Sands?”
Carbon in atmosphere is 400ppm in May. Highest safe amount of carbon in air is 350ppm. Most major Media did not report this and help public understand the facts of climate change and extreme weather.
In the early 1980s Suzuki did a ‘Nature of Things’ program about Alternative Energy where he mentioned a Canadian company that had converted a vehicle to run on ammonia fuel.
Science team identifies tipping point in climate change: 2047.
Soci-et-y………Soci mean To Join, companions. et means time or age……-y meaning state or condition, result of activity….OR…… marked by, having.
I don’t trust my government to put people over profit. I trust David Suzuki as a respected elder to continue to keep our ill advised leaders in check. But he should not have to!
David Suzuki tirelessly has worked to bring awareness of our negative impact on nature.
I want my 11 month old son to grow up in a world free of pollution and rampant greed.
I respect this elder.
Our grandchildren need clean water, clean air & healthy soil to grow food, so they may have a healthy future.
Why does he need not guilty evidence???????? He speaks the TRUTH!!!
I respect David Suzuki because he is one of the Scientists that saw these problems and had the courage to go to the media.
Our leaders need to listen to the truth that David Suzuki speaks and act on the advise he is giving to all people. We need clean water, air and soil. Does the Canadian government care for our health and future ?
It’s interesting to note that David Suzuki’s stances are against every single one of Herr Harper’s policies, I find it just a little too convenient that he is now a “radical enemy”
Living in Nunavut, we see climate change drastically. It is now November 6 and there still has not been snow that has fallen and stayed on the ground. This is unheard of in Pangnirtung, this time last year most of the town was out on snow machines hunting.
He’s a cool guy.
I respect this Elder.
Royal Report: Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for the Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada
This year’s coastal BC salmon run washed up thousands of sick wild salmon. I personally found multiple on river banks in Squamish, BC that were sick, ill-coloured, with lice attached.
Cancer is being caused by pollution in our air cause by industry that have a carbon foot print.
When Northern Canada starts experiencing the warmest temperatures it’s seen in at least 120,000 years, you’d think that might cause a few smart people to pay attention…
How could anyone hold a man guilty for coming to his own conclusions about the Canadian government and sharing them with the world? He is completely entitled to his truth. It is important to listen to a man like this, passionate and well educated. He is an environmental hero.
I have personally seen the coral reefs of the Caribbean and North Atlantic begin the initial phases of death due to water temperature change.
I am so opposed to Fracking and the destruction in the oil sands. Water is our most important resource and without it we will die.
if one man, such as a renowned scientist as Dr. David suzuki manifests that we need to stop doing what we are doing to the environment…
The manifesto was a neccesity.
The situation is more dire than the presentation showed–no consideration of self-reinforcing climate warming feedback loops, no consideration of methane as a greenhouse gas. Humanity may well now be in a hospice situation, awaiting species extinction in the near term.
Our government is doing less and less to protect our environment and the fact that our own scientists are being muzzled while losing larger shares of the revenue to help monitor and protect our own land speaks volumes
We seriously can’t speak out about these issues in Canada of all places? What happened to freedom of speech?
Mr. Suzuki has been teaching me since kindergarten! And his views have NOT changed in the slightest bit!
I drive my car to places I could just walk to, or even ride my bike. I wish there was a different alternative that wasn’t harmful to the environment!